- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GemDemo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 03:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. It doesn't look like anyone's used that software in years. Theymos (talk) 03:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unable to find evidence of notability. No third party non-trivial sources. However, how many people currently use software is irrelevant to notability. Nobody has used Multiplan in years, but it is still notable, and if this software had the requisite sources, it would be as well. Jo7hs2 (talk) 00:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability, lack of sources. The Rolling Camel (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.