- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 02:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- GenerateXY (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed PROD. I can find no reliable sources to support this product's notability. Singularity42 (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- delete this, delete Tankogen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) too. Two related products, with articles by the same creator and no notable footprint for either. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm also nominating Tankogen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), as they're two related products with the same lack of evident notability.
- If anyone has a problem with a multiple AfD like this, just split it. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both - OR, not notable, self promotion. Kilmer-san (talk) 22:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.