Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation "We..."

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Generation "We..."

This is a marketing term, not a notable generation. Many other neologisms have been deleted or merged from Wikipedia. In my opinion http://www.nationaljournal.com/campaigns/2007/articles/0309nj1.htm is probably the only citation worth merging into Generation Y and from the article it is clear that the authors are not seriously proposing Generation We as a title for a generation, it's just a title for the article Kevin143 (talk) 01:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the nom's statement, "not a notable generation" is probably not what he meant to say, after all, is it even possible to call this particular generation, in its entirety, as notable or not? Nonetheless, I've looked at all the sources, and it does appear to me to be more of a marketing gimmick than anything. That may change some day, but for now, this just doesn't cut it, so I'm voting delete. Un school 02:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, delete. i mean who is really gonna use this term? Mimzy1990 (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Who is ever going to use the term 'Generation We...'? This is a marketing term. I agree, delete. 67.207.41.202 (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Eh, nobody ever calls this Generation Y (or We). Not sure if we need to start now... Renaissancee (talk) 22:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried deleting this and redirecting it to Generation Z ... why can't i? isn't there consensus now it's bs? Mimzy1990 (talk) 07:55, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the WP:AFD page. In particular the sections "What to do after an AfD discussion has passed" and "How an AfD discussion is closed". Beeswaxcandle (talk) 09:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a neologism/marketing term (WP:NAD) --IllaZilla (talk) 04:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.