- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete (G11) by Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Generation free (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable dict-def. Blowdart | talk 13:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:DICDEF.--Boffob (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Googling this produces false hits out the wazoo, but no strong indication that this is anything other than a neologism that hasn't caught on. Mangoe (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, article seems to exist entirely for promoting a website that seeks to make this phrase a buzzword wannabe: (t)he term is being focused on by marketing, indeed. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (G11) — There was a relatively new term coined for stuff like this some ten years ago - it's called spamming. MuZemike (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- G11 this. Complete SPAM. ~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 19:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 05:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.