Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generic wavelength

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"original research" at best, but more accurately labelled pseudoscience. article creator cannot answer necessary fundamental questions on Talk:Natural units. r b-j 02:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:OR. The following sentence in the article gives it away: "Generic wavelength has minimal use in technical literature and is not used consistently." -- Koffieyahoo 04:49, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOR. Michael 06:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. OR, and unsalvageable gibberish. --Lambiam^Talk 08:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 10:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Localzuk ^(talk) 14:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.