Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geneshift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No delete comments in two weeks after sources where mentioned and no further discussion of the sources presented. SoWhy 06:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geneshift

Geneshift (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG in question, and possible COI ^{Atsme📞📧} 03:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Coverage is trivial, a few articles with minimal/vague details based on a press release and video. Plus the game is in early access and the developer wrote the article. Let's let someone else start the article after there's significant third-party coverage. Woodroar (talk) 03:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - It's got no less SIGCOV in RS than other titles of the same caliber.

• https://www.gamespot.com/articles/chaotic-gta-2-inspired-co-op-shooter-geneshift-lau/1100-6450124/
• https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2017/03/30/geneshift-is-a-homage-to-gta-with-mutant-multiplayer/
• http://www.siliconera.com/2017/05/24/geneshift-multiplayer-top-shooter-gta2-vehicular-twist/
• http://www.pcgamer.com/meet-the-indie-dev-who-spent-two-years-making-a-game-in-youth-hostels-abroad/
• https://waypoint.vice.com/en_us/article/after-eight-years-one-developers-dream-project-is-finally-on-steam

☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Has been covered by reliable sources, as Salv showed. Alongside his findings, I found this, this, and this. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Did this get a single review? czar 06:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.