Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genetic Research and Security Organization
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, as not notable --Steve (Stephen) talk 09:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Genetic Research and Security Organization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No sourcing or evidence of notability, only 7 ghits for "Genetic Research and Security Organization" -wikipedia, representing about 3 unique websites, indicates a lack of notability or likely reliable sources. Prod removed without relevant edit summary. — Swpb talk contribs 01:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 11:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete.
This is considered to be a conspiracy theory. As most likely about the New World Order.per nom.--Edtropolis 13:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]- It doesn't seem to be a conspiracy theory, it seems to be a very minor element of a fictional universe. — Swpb talk contribs 13:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Edtropolis has been blocked indefinitely as an SPA for AFD votes with nonsensical or inappropriate rationales. — Swpb talk contribs 22:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable.--cj | talk 06:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Swpb talk contribs 14:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources with real world context. Jay32183 19:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails verification and npov. VanTucky 07:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.