- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 09:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn neologism. --Peta 07:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. 589 unique Google hits, and it seems to be used in quite a few scholarly journal articles, though probably in a different context. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Coredesat. Dionyseus 08:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, this should be expanded and more sources should be provided, but I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. It's probably used in a very limited context, though. -- H·G (words/works) 08:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete at best, it's a dicdef. I'm not opposed to transwiki'ing to Wiktionary WilyD 18:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. Hitting about 500 Google hits is quite a high number and this makes the topic notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 18:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.