- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Genius Files (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Extremely short article (two sentences), no useful information Luinfana (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This can be mentioned as a section in Anna Sui. Mandsford (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article does not even say what the so-called Genius Files are! •Life of Riley (talk) 06:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MattieTK 11:17, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Possible A1. Has no assertion or indication of notability of article subject. LeaveSleaves talk 01:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Googling Anna Sui and Genius Files together found http://www.annasuibeauty.com/site/about_anna_genius.htm which to me means it's not an A1 candidate: there is enough context to find something more about what it is. But if her own site's supposed history of this clipping file is so minimal, how can it possibly be notable? —David Eppstein (talk) 07:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.