- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 02:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Genomatica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable film. DimaG (talk) 00:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. I had begun a cleanup to the article, but stopped when I was unable to find any reliable sources that might show notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 00:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the above. Unless someone can find sources demonstrating notability (and if MQS can't they probably don't exist at least in an easily accessible form) the article should be deleted. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.