This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. android79 01:21, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Protologism, on Wiktionary:List of protologisms#GZeimusu | Talk page 01:46, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- What does this mean? And if "Protologism" can be a word, why can't "genrelization" be a word. Neither are wildy used or accepted as words, however, I'm sure both have equally strong and well iterated definitions. rm81dragon 13:14, 15 September 2005 (EDT)
- Comment see Wiktionary:Protologisms. Google suggests the word has been independently created many times, with various meanings. Still wikipedia is not a dictionary. Zeimusu | Talk page 00:23, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Another editor has aimed for the dictionary and missed, hitting the encyclopaedia instead. Even if this were cleaned up to be an encyclopaedia article, it would be an article on "genrelization". But the article cites no sources and no sources can be found that show that there's any such concept. This article is unverifiable. The only things that Google Web turns up are mis-spellings of "generalization". We usually only do mis-spelling redirects when someone has actually made the mis-spelling and created a duplicate article, which is not the case here. Delete. Uncle G 23:42, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.