- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.--Húsönd 00:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable graphics technique used in one game Steve 00:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Poorly written article on a extremely non notable technique -- wtfunkymonkey 01:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. "invented by a man on..." Devotchka 02:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Stenun 03:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why need this be deleted just because you guys don't like it. What a snobby little community Wikipedia has become.
- Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 06:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, nothing much to say about this. --Terence Ong (C | R) 10:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not out of any snobbery, but because it fails WP:V. -- Whpq 18:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Its could be a genuine technique. Give the editor a chance to expand and provide notable sources. scope_creep 20:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomnination. Xdenizen 21:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.