- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Santander Group. J04n(talk page) 22:54, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Geoban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another article that seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:CORP badly. Wikipedia is not your business and products listing directory, sigh. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 11. Snotbot t • c » 19:08, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Santander Group. The text says "100% Santander, Geoban is integrated within the Technology and Operations Division of the Group"; that says to me that it is merely a functional part, not even at division level. AllyD (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect. Text like this shouldn't even stick around in history: Geoban is integrated within the Technology and Operations Division of the Group with a clear objective in mind: to improve the group's operating efficiency. For that purpose, since it was founded the company has evolved from a basic model of services to the current model which involves the specialisation of processes and factorisation of activities, thus achieving the highest possible level of efficiency and excellence for the transactions of Santander Group. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.