Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Pope (composer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted under G7; author blanked Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Geoffrey Pope (composer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Geoffrey Pope has not been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works and does not meet any of the criteria for composers and lyricists listed at Wikipedia:Notability (music). Furthermore, according to the article, his most notable composition hasn't even been performed yet. Nrswanson (talk) 02:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 02:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- debated. nrswanson, not sure what you're referring to as his "most notable composition." the bosnian opera? Pinesofrome (talk) 03:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC) — Pinesofrome (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Source his awards. Deletion not required. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. None of the awards listed are in themselves notable and would not fulfill the requirements given in Wikipedia:Notability (music). If you actually read the awards given they are all pretty much related to collegiate programs and/or non-professional ensembles. Therefore those awards really don't make him notable. Also there are no reliable independent sources given even substantiating any of this articles information.Nrswanson (talk) 10:33, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:Music criteria. Sources show work and awards are all at the university scholarship level. He appears to be a talented student composer -- but should reapply after he becomes an accomplished professional. — CactusWriter | needles 18:39, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - blanked by author (so tagged). ... discospinster talk 19:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.