Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geography of the BattleTech universe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Geography of the BattleTech universe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, detailed in-universe material. Only sources cited are from the original game source material itself. --Craw-daddy | T | 23:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No assertion or evidence of real-world notability. No encyclopedic content worth merging. --EEMIV (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is a plot-only description of a fictional work, it has no references independent of the subject from reliable third-party sources, it does not meet the general notability guideline or the criteria of appropriate topics for lists and it's an unneeded content fork. Jfgslo (talk) 17:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Instead of a delete, why not just put a redirect to BattleTech? That way its easier for someone to transwiki the information elsewhere, should anyone decide to adopt the long abandoned Battetech.wikia.com or port it over to a different wiki. Dream Focus 10:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have transwikied this article, and its full history, to http://battletech.wikia.com/wiki/Geography_of_the_BattleTech_universe where anyone interested can continue editing it. Dream Focus 18:58, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.