- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Gephi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable open source project. Only version available for download is an alpha release from February this year. I cannot find any significant coverage in WP:reliable sources noq (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I wasn't able to find much sourcing either. RayTalk 19:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete Gephi is relatively new, but it is hardly "non-notable." For example, Google Summer of Code has eight proposals for work on Gephi this year, and several interesting data visualization projects have been published in the lay literature. Rneches (talk • contribs)
- Can you add references from WP:reliable sources to verify WP:Notability? noq (talk) 06:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.