Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Paid to website

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Spam magnet, NN. This article, and all redirects, salted. Black Kite 00:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get Paid to website (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article about an unestablished protologism says nothing that isn't inherently obvious in the words of the term itself. It is completely lacking in sources and is mere bait for Internet marketing spam. Reswobslc (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt, along with the redirects GPT website, Paid to Read, Paid to Click, Gpt website, Get paid to website, Get Paid To website, Get paid to read. (Nominator) Reswobslc (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unsourced, spam-magnet. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Spammy junk content Beeblbrox (talk) 07:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete spam advert. Also suggest salting this and the redirects per reswobslc. Doc Strange (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt, along with all those redirects. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt What Reswobslc said. BusterD (talk) 03:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. Cloudz679 (talk) 13:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.