- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Get Smart 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
per WP:NFF, nothing really notable about the production so far. SoSaysChappy (talk) 04:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; film has not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography and, therefore, it should not have its own article yet. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 15:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Gosox5555 (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFF since it has not begun production; no issue with recreation if it does begin filming. Information at Get Smart (film)#Sequel is sufficient. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect cuz i said so —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.185.59.204 (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:JUSTAVOTE. Cheers. I'mperator 23:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Get Smart (film)#Sequel, as it fails NFF (not in production yet). No point in having it remain a red link, though. Cheers, I'mperator 21:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.