Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get binary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 18:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Get binary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable WP:CORP, promotional with only WP:EL to own website, no references/citations. CSDs have been removed three times by SPA/socks. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 16:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Creator is a sock too. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even if sources are found (and I haven't found any) the article content mostly is just a description of how binary options work. Without that, it's a stub. --Sammy1339 (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Get Lost. Szzuk (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is that supposed to mean? I am taking that as you telling me to 'get lost' for nominating this for AfD.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 00:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm telling the sock to get lost! Szzuk (talk) 06:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.