- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 12:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Protologism invented last month on a web forum. Prod-ed (thrice no less, oops), tag deleted with edit comment The term is widely used by tens of thousands of people, a wikipedia article will help others understand. Weregerbil 11:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The term has been used for months ad is now featured used by some of the print media and is now a daily phrase for many Scots therefore it merits a place in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.94.206 (talk • contribs)
- Can you please cite some verifiable sources? Preferably some that verify the phrase originated in March 2006 on the chat forums as described in the article. Weregerbil 12:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
http://followfollow.proboards86.com/index.cgi?board=offtopic&action=display&thread=1143250407 (membership required) 500 people using "get it pumped". Maybe some of you trying to delete the article need to, as they say, "Get it pumped"
- Delete Google mainly returns this phrase in conjunction with emptying septic tanks. If it was really as popular as suggested, finding references would be easy. Seems like WP:NFT and WP:BALLS. Gwernol 13:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --DMG413 14:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Astrokey44|talk 15:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless actual evidence shows up. RGTraynor 16:12, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete as a user of the web forum in question, I have seen it, it is funny but is not widely used. Bill the bear 21:05, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Response - If you are indeed a member of Follow Follow then you cannot have looked at it in a while as get it pumped is fecking huge
- Delete it is a joke but it is WP:BALLS. Alibabs 21:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Its not a joke, many people subscribe to the get it pumped philosophy.
- Delete not just is the phrase a protologism, but the author was a real jerk to another user on Talk:Get it pumped. -- Kicking222 22:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete, just because some anonymous kid on some internet forum made up an expression doesn't make it wiki material. -- Ritchy 22:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 22:36, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fukkin keep it! GET IT PUMPED! —This unsigned comment was added by 195.188.152.16 (talk • contribs) .
- Strong delete, 500 people using a term is certainly not notable. Also note that the anon who has been commenting in here is a vandal and a violator of WP:NPA. --
Rory09623:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 23:24, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Big Jock Knew 23:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable and non-verifiable neologism. If its sole reference is a pseudonym on an Internet forum, then it isn't encyclopedic by a long shot. JIP | Talk 08:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Admrb♉ltz (T | C | k) 07:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Get it pumped out into the Clyde like the utter cruft it is Deizio 23:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.