Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giani Raghbir Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giani Raghbir Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources provide only routine coverage to this individual which is no different than WP:NOTNEWS. Many other Jathedars of Akal Takht also don't have separate articles. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sikhism, and Punjab. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N and is a case of WP:BLP1E at best. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I agree with the nominator. If articles are created in this manner, then every Jathedar would end up with an article. In this particular case, the coverage is limited to the time of his appointment, with no additional significant coverage beyond that. This suggests that the subject is notable for only a single event (WP:BLP1E), which does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG. Baqi:) (talk) 09:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:BIO1E which does not help the subject to sufficiently pass WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.