- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GibLink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The only reliable source that isn't a press release/self published is in forbes, and the coverage is not significant. Doesn't meet notability or web guidelines Omarcheeseboro (talk) 01:48, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like spam. Smells like spam. Probably spam. Doesn't help that the article's poor quality either. WikiScrubber (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable social networking site. Facebook wanna-be. Not yet. Spam. Proxy User (talk) 17:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.