- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Gideros Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT. Dewritech (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable software article with no RS references - provided refs are press releases, blog entries, and a youtube video; created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 23:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Retain - This is a debate about whether to DELETE the Gideros entry from the world's most comprehensive encyclopaedia. There should only be one question debated here: "Is Gideros NOTEWORTHY?" Aurigin (talk) 13:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.