- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Gilt and Grime (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Don't think this passes notability and appears to be a publicity stuntSadads (talk) 22:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don'ty understand why the nominator beleives it is a publicity stunt. It appears that this theatre company is simply not notable as they have no coverage in reliable sources that I can find. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be a startup theater group, might become notable in the future, could be recreated then. For now the only reviews are on blogs; no Reliable Sources found. --MelanieN (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.