- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 18:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- plus Gimsonrobotics
Advertising/unnotable. Article was prodded but tag was removed. —Xezbeth 11:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Robotics is always interesting, but an online store isn't that notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 11:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As owner of article, I would like to suggest that you gave me time to extend my article portfolio before you delete the Gimson Robotics entry? I aim to extend detailed entries on the products offered and their uses - I cannot yet find entries for the items I aim to write about - and given time I would ultimately link to other entries from the Gimson Robotics article. Please could you state how this can be considered advertising when my aim is to create a useful free resource eventually. Thank you, Ewan Gimson --Gimsonrobotics 11:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Would expanding the article make it any less of an advert - of course not. And Gimsonrobotics please read ownership of articles. -- RHaworth 12:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete of both; right now, zero content. RGTraynor 16:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete even before author blanking, these were pure spamvercrutisment. Gwernol 00:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.