Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girish Mathrubootham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Girish Mathrubootham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is entirely based on Freshdesk, the company, rather than the subject. And the sources are most all churnalism rather than something substantive. Kbabej (talk) 00:33, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clear advertising as was the company article itself since not only are we aware that such publications will only consist of the republished advertising hence not independent or convincing at all, the history emphasizes this thus delete. SwisterTwister talk 01:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking reliable independent sources to substantiate notability. Guy (Help!) 08:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your heads up on this article. I would like to know which sources do you think are ok, in general, any user who is willing to contribute in wiki will depend upon the news sources considering that news sources will be reliable. I believe news published in the reliable news websites will be of proper one and generally people believe those sources are from the reputed news sources. Whenever i write any article, i always consider other wiki pages for references. Do you think are the sources mentioned in this wiki pages are reliable? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Khuner in this wiki article, i see the sources are from only google. Also the same over here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_and_Jordan_Kandell this article uses imdb as the sources and news websites too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slim_Brundage here too it has only google links as sources. What would i generally suggest is, rather deleting the articles, it would be better if we fine tune and make it as the best one. This will also boost the wiki users to write more articles in a proper way and also we can have some good articles on wiki. I expect your opinion on this User:Barath Rajendran (talk) 12:33, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.