Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend experience (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Girlfriend experience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Un-referenced article, full of original research. GimliDotNet (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note in the 5 years since the original AFD, no references have been found to give notability to this article. GimliDotNet (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Being unreferenced and containing OR are not reasons for deletion. There are plenty of sources covering this, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep A lot of references are avaliable. GFE has coverage in Encyclopedia of prostitution and sex work. Here is one more reference --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 13:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. I'm seeing literally thousands of results in searches of WP:RS secondary and independent sources. — Cirt (talk) 03:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm glad every knows about all the sources, and yet five years after the original AFD, no-one has still bothered to add any to the article. We shouldn't keep unless editors cite their sources. GimliDotNet (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep After reviewing the sources and the recent edits, I'd like to withdraw this AFD. Do I just close it or does someone else take care of that? GimliDotNet (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.