Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gizzverse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard#Gizzverse. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 00:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gizzverse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Gizzverse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:DRAFT since it was recreated by the author. Page is entirely unsourced, and there isn't any evidence of notability. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unsourced nonsense, probably meets/is borderline WP:SPEEDYDELETE category G1. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete. Unsourced and random. Fits WP:SPEEDYDELETE. Floating Orb Let's talk! 01:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Strongly delete. Article is completely random and there are no sources to establish notability. Possibly also made up as well. Galaxybeing (talk) 03:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard#Gizzverse: Gizzverse is certainly a real term used to describe the band's lore ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]). But I think it can be reasonably expanded on the band's page. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 06:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Gizzverse section of band article per @LastJabberwocky. Looks like the creator had another go at this article after I draftified Gizzversus. I did find some of those sources but this in-universe stream-of-consciousness stuff doesn't belong here. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as suggested by the voters above because the topic could be a search term and it already has a sub-section at the band's article. Otherwise this new article is pure fancruft that accomplishes nothing encyclopedic. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:46, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect for reasons above. Definitely fancruft that is incomprehensible to a non-fan.Dflovett (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.