Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glamtron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glamtron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the artist is clearly notable with much coverage in reliable sources, I'm not sure if that extends to this mixtape. I couldn't find any coverage about this mixtape at all in any reliable source. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many albums and EPs of various artist are as such on wikipedia. Since there isn't much coverage from reliable sources, I would go with deletion. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 04:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I speedied this last time out, promo for non-notable mix Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - To be honest, I'm not even sure if this mixtape even exists; a comprehensive search failed to find any hits at all for this release. While the songs mentioned in the article do appear to exist, I can't seem to find anything at all that suggested that Honard released a mixtape with this title. About the only hits related to Honard I could find that mention "Glamtron" suggest that that's part of his stage persona or a name used by him, but nothing about the CD. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – no claim to notability that would meet WP:NALBUM. Even the article references don't suggest that it actually exists. PriceDL (talk) 08:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.