- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- GlanMer Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Google search on '"GlanMer Media" -site:youtube.com -site:wikipedia.org -site:facebook.com' produces nothing. Zad68 13:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. This is basically a YouTube comedy troupe trying to pass themselves off as a valid film production company. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete -- User:WikiDan61 has put it precisely. There are no reliable sources that I could find. Ubelowme U Me 13:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I considered speedy-A7 but then saw the article has the sentence "TODAY GlanMer today is growing and formalized with a signed contract, more than 25 short's and many achivments," which can be considered an "indication of importance," and I've seen speedys get declined for about the equivalent.... interested to see what happens.
Zad6813:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Quite right -- better to be safe than sorry. I don't think it ever hurts to have the community take a hard look at an individual article and I agree with your thoughts about the potential for notability, however tenuous. Ubelowme U Me 13:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I now see that Alexf speedy-deleted this article a short while before it was re-created.
Zad6813:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I considered speedy-A7 but then saw the article has the sentence "TODAY GlanMer today is growing and formalized with a signed contract, more than 25 short's and many achivments," which can be considered an "indication of importance," and I've seen speedys get declined for about the equivalent.... interested to see what happens.
- Speedy delete as my original A7 the first time this article was created (and deleted). I actually gave some serious thought to whether A7 fit, for reasons similar to Zad68 above (the original had very similar language), but I concluded that those claims just aren't credibly important. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and tagged for so. Hindustan Zinda bad 15:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.