Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Development Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7 and G11 have already been declined but the SPI has now been closed and G5 is clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Development Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

previously speedy deleted page under G11 and A7( not applicable). see Global development institute. page also lacks multiple credible sources to support its claim of significance and created by GDI UoM (Global Development Institute University of Manchester) so a serious case of WP:COI. Nicky mathew (talk) 03:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Previous instances of this article were created last week by User:Globaldevelopmentinstitute, which was reminded about WP:COI standards and then blocked. What looks like the same article has now been created by User:GDI UoM. Leaving aside WP:SOCK and undeclared COI matters, there is no evidence of WP:RS coverage of this Institute, which was formed last month. At best WP:TOOSOON; until better can be demonstrated, through accomplishments over a period of time, maybe the name variants should be WP:SALTed? AllyD (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per CSD G5(created by blocked user in violation of block). The two creators of this page seem to be the same person. I have started an SPI. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.