- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 14:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Global IDs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails to address WP:ORG. The only matches in GNews are within the walled garden of vendor related puffery (such as 'vendors to watch') and press releases. The impact required for ORG is unlikely to be demonstrated in independent reliable sources in the near future. Fæ (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, notability not established. This only made it past db-spam through the efforts of several sock accounts. Hairhorn (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yet another Data Governance and Master Data Management software provider advertising on Wikipedia. The vague, meaninglessly abstract descriptions are bad enough; do you have to call attention to them with Capital Letters? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Administrator note All accounts that have made actual edits to this article have been blocked for sockpuppetry. Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.