Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glyph (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Autobots#Female Autobots. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glyph (Transformers)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character doesn't establish notability, and it is unlikely any sources exist for it. TTN (talk) 23:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Autobots#Female Autobots (although it could also go to List of female Transformers#Transformers: Universe). Minor character without independent notability. (There seems some question about whether there are 2 separate characters with this name, or one is a variant of the other. If the two are separate, they shouldn't be treated in the same article. But it sounds like the producers didn't really care whether they were the same, so why should we? And the question of whether they're the same isn't discussed in reliable sources. If we redirect to the former heading, that avoids worrying over whether we're purely talking about the character from T:U.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Autobots#Female Autobots. I agree with Cola. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Autobots#Female Autobots, where the character is already listed. The character not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to support a separate article. Rangoondispenser (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.