- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Go hatchet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a slang dictionary or things made up one day Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:38, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and WP:V. JohnCD (talk) 14:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per JohnCD. There should be a WP:CSD criterion for articles about things made up one day with no claim of notability. Edison (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - Neologism, and borderline G3. Aditya (talk) 17:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "tests still in the early stages" What tests? It's a freakin WP:NEO, not a science project. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.