Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go help

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go help

Noteablilty not asserted in article. --Latebird (talk) 08:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Its a charity, so is not advertising and is for good cause.--Un poisson pour manger a la bouche, s'il vous plait. (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Salvageable, but currently the notablilty is not asserted and the creator has had a week to add content. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 09:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC) PS If kept, should be moved to 'Go Help' with 'Go help' as a redirect not vice versa. Ben MacDui ^Talk/Walk 09:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. —Latebird (talk) 09:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Charity or not, this article does not assert notability. There are a number of charities that organize charitable events and there is currently no assertion why this group is any different. TN‑X-Man 17:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of notability per WP:ORG from WP:RS. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Good cause or bad, Wikipedia is not a soapbox, the article seems promotional, and the subject seems to lack notability. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Routemaster Rampage seems related, could have been listed with this perhaps. Dloh cierekim 22:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.