Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold sol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Colloidal gold. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gold sol

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1) poor formatting 2)no citations 3) reads like it is either original research or was copied from a paper EvilxFish (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

discovered the article is a copy and paste job from this paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021979784712100 EvilxFish (talk) 17:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since the paper is non-free, I have marked it as G12. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 18:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete straightaway. Copypaste from the abstract is evidence enough. Rhadow (talk) 18:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: good pick up. The article had versions which did not contain the copvio above and was salvageable from G12. The copyios have been WP:REVDEL-d. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to Colloidal gold. Duplicate.--Shirt58 (talk) 04:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.