Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Guys Finish First

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Guys Finish First

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The claim of notability seems absurdly niche. TheLongTone (talk) 14:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bestsellers list reference says #42. Comes without a review. Two reviews on Amazon, one by a friend of the author. Amazon ranking #2,072,877. Rhadow (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:26, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to fail WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG; no sources seemed to be available, though this was somewhat confounded by a song with a similar title. --Hazarasp (talk) 11:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.