Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Story Productions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good Story Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable production house. Variation 25.2 (talk) 18:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete- Non notable production house, Burn and salt.Ireneshih (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep- Notable production house, major productions, notable producers and talent..SamPeters123 (talk) 12:144, 31 July 2015 (UTC)— SamPeters123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Notability is determined by reliable sources, the article currently lacks that requirement. - Aoidh (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- I believe Sam is Goodstory's changed name as was requested of him/her. As Goodstory he/she has been a low activity editor in good standing for over 9 years. It was only the creation of this article that brought the WP:UAA & WP:COI issues to light. Looking at the entirety of his/her contributions the SPA tag is undeserved. Bazj (talk) 21:08, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Notability is determined by reliable sources, the article currently lacks that requirement. - Aoidh (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. The only sources are IMDB, blogs, press releases, but nothing substantial that shows any notability whatsoever. - Aoidh (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. Bazj (talk) 20:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.