Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good ol' boy network
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Good ol' boy network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 18:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not verified as even a real topic, unreferenced stub tagged for years. Aside from any NPOV issues inherent to the proposed topic, whatever information it might contain appears to already be more than adequately covered under the umbrella of Good ol' boy, among others, making this article redundant. Merging seems pointless as the article is only three sentences and five links. OldManNeptune ⚓ 10:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems a bit of a muddle, conflating the concepts of the old boy network and good ol' boy. Warden (talk) 10:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --BDD (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the Colonel above. Perhaps a redirect to old boy network would be appropriate. There needs to be an American section added to that piece, for what it's worth... Carrite (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.