This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. My understanding is that wikt:protologisms are not acceptable to Wiktionary, so the transwiki suggestion is not useful here. -Splashtalk 00:12, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a good sign when the article includes a link to neologism - and, indeed, that's what it is. DS 15:27, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, just like gahoogle and Googleitis yesterday. Jkelly 19:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete protologism with 0 googles. — brighterorange (talk) 19:20, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep - wikipedia has other neologisms - this one is pretty descriptive and describes a common activity (unlike gahoogle)
- keep - this is something i do alot, now i have a name for it. 7:06pm 17 September 2005
- Delete - nn-neologism. --Daveb 12:58, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary as dicdef. Owen× ☎ 02:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.