 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 January 14. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Denelson83 05:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax, information with a speculative nature Mateusc 19:18, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- ANNIHILATE!, now we're going to have articles that are pure speculation on what Google might or might not do? —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 19:25, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ashibaka (tock) 19:51, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete cohesion | talk 19:55, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. I still believe this is a completely random rumor and wishful thinking, even with the Chinese article (It loses credibility in the first sentence, claiming that the OS uses both Linux and the GNU Hurd). But,
- It is very widespread as a rumor.
- Google does make a hacked-up Linux for its servers that could be the origin of the rumors. Gazpacho 21:56, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think it's the source of the Chinese page linked in the article. Ashibaka (tock) 23:35, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:ISNOT a crystal ball. Tonywalton | Talk 23:37, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can zoom in to almost lifesize on the Google complex using Google Earth and found no evidence of this OS. :) ESkog 01:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, pure speculation. The idea of a Hurd based system from Google is kinda neat though. --Apyule 05:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Rogerd 12:18, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:ISNOT a rumor database. MCB 00:47, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wow! How obvious of a fake rumor it is! Rhetoricalwater 18:22, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.