Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google translate sings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Google translate sings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, no indication of notability, appears to describe a recreational pastime for moments at the computer when we are bored. No indication of cultural significance (if any) or significance to, for example, machine translation. Comprised of original research, contains unencyclopedic statements about alleged hilarity and what "most people have found". Possibly a school project. Some of the content might be suitable example material in an article like Machine translation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom—without discussing the validity of the subject, it is obvious that the content is not useful for any potential article. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 01:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft namespace It is useful as a generic Easter egg article. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 22:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, especially as not even the title is sourced or well known. While a discussion of this subject may be appropriate in a relevant article such as Google Translate, this article contains no useful content. BethNaught (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, uses weasel words and has no sources. --DavidK93 (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clear lack of notability, it's about somebody's google game and isn't encyclopaedic in the slightest. Ducknish (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as apparently WP:MADEUP. Ludicrosity in suits when reading this article — to say nothing of the Marpleisms. Cnilep (talk) 04:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of this article is a copyright violation consisting of the lyrics to Let It Go (Disney song) and a plagiarism of this YouTube video. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.