- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn, article even says it's a neologism.. splintax (talk) 15:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Dude, you forgot to add the AfD tag! I've added it now. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom. Obina 15:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOT a dictionary, and especially not a dictionary of made-up terms from a collection of minor 'blogs. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ... I couldn't really find hits for this on Google, though frankly, that was to be expected ... --Cyde Weys votetalk 15:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:NOT and WP:OR. -- SoothingR(pour) 15:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 16:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable unverifiable recent neologism --Quarl 21:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Take it to LiveJournal, dude... Ashibaka tock 02:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.