- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 21:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, original research, no external sources, and admitted conflict of interest on talk page by editor who coined the term. ZimZalaBim (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article seems more to attempt to introduce the term than to attempt to assert notability or widespread usage. Calgary 14:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While the term seems at odds to introduce the term as much as describe it (neologism), it also is true that google generation and similar terms have often been used over the last few years to describe in particular young people. Tony Blair used the term in a famous 'soundbite'. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 15:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Providing citations are the first step... --ZimZalaBim (talk) 16:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete General WP:NOT - unreferenced original research. Shalom Hello 22:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.