- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. While not quite blatantly spammy enough to fall under G11, the article does completely fail to assert any significance. It is therefore a worthy candidate for A7. ~ mazca talk 21:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gooroo Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CORP, hardly any third party coverage [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: blatant advertising that contains not a soupçon of minimal importance, as well as offensive patter: a British business software vendor. It uses the world wide web as a delivery medium; citing the software as a service model.... uses Cloud Computing to deliver online business management services to small to medium organizations. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as non-notable; A7. I don't think it's G11able (it's not blatantly advertising – it does ponce up what services are provided, but I don't think its terribly promotional in tone or a WP:NPOV violation) but there's no assertion of notability. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 19:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.