- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Syrthiss with the reason "csd g1 nonsense". - Bobet 21:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed with no explanation, non-notable neologism. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as nonsense. Rklawton 19:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know...it's not really nonsense, and it does seem to have a (very small) cult following. Nonetheless, it's still not notable. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think having a (very) small following disqualifies something from being utter nonsense. Try this: copy and paste your next typographical error into Google and see if it, too, has a small "flollowing." (mine had 577 Google hits). Rklawton 19:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.