Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grafting number (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The last two !votes were disregarded for lack of a rationale. Kurykh (talk) 03:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grafting number

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable mathematical term. Previously deleted in July 2012, but G4 speedy deletion was declined. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Though I can’t see the previous version of this article to compare, non-notable, whether it’s on the same number or not, as just something someone made up. No evidence of any mathematical notability.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 16:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - seems to only be discussed in one source, R. Tanniru, A short note introducing Grafting Numbers and their connection to Catalan Numbers, J. Comb. Math. and Comb. Computing, 95 (2015), 309-312. Tanniru is also the submitter of the sequence to OEIS. Smmurphy^(Talk) 18:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Power~enwiki (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Matt Parker. XOR'easter (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.