Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Walk Networking (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep last AfD was three days ago and the consensus was to keep. Awyong J. M. Salleh 04:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Walk Networking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This is the 2nd AfD. THe first was below for conflict of interest. During this nomination it was apparent that sources do not claim notibility or verifability. The article has a number of extra readings which are all mainly internal references. The 3 external sources to no assert notibility in any way.

The first source claims to be for the sentance "Many of the Great Walk Networking participants had been involved with other organisations that were formed prior to 1988 to address significant threats to Western Australian forests: the Campaign to Save Native Forests (CSNF) and South West Forest Defence Foundation (SWFDF)" but the source makes no mention of Great Walk Network participants being involved. The 2nd source is a passing mention in a list of hundreds of other non profit organisations who support land conservation. The 3rd reference is merely an ABN listing, for which there are millions in australia.

The article therefore does not have verifability (in reguard to claims on the number of walkers and significance of the club) and has shown nothing to indicate it is notable for WP:ORG standards, thus DeleteDacium 04:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: tending to speedy keep since nominator is in blatant disregard of consensus at the previous AfD which closed just three days ago. Awyong J. M. Salleh 04:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.