Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greathall Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. no quorum, so a WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greathall Productions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a company of questionable notability. Google news search shows zero results. Standard search shows quite a few sales and simple directory links, primary and unreliable sources, but no significant coverage of the company itself from independent reliable sources. I can not find corroboration from reliable sources on the alleged awards, either. MikeWazowski (talk) 03:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lots of primary source hits. No Secondary source hits.Curb Chain (talk) 04:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.