Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreedyGame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GreedyGame

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear advertising with clear advertising-motivations by advertising-only accounts, not only considering every single thing here is either published or republished PR advertising, but the casualty of simply tossing links without actually specifying shows it too, regardless of anything, because that's exactly what WP:NOT states, we are not a company-advertising platform, and this is quite clear it was supposed to be used as one. For Wikipedia's sake, the history itself shows this was not planned for anything else but advertising, so it's both blatant and covert advertising. SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam on a run of the mill tech company. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a promo piece. Agree with K.e.coffman on the run of the mill coverage/company. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.